This entry was posted on Saturday, June 18th, 2011 at 6:41 am and is filed under Blog.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.
I take your point… but the fact remains that most scientists today are not religious.
In a 1998 survey of members of the National Academy Of Sciences, only 7% believed in a personal god. Richard Dawkins observes that that’s almost the polar opposite of the general american public.
In a more recent survey of the Royal Society (scientists of Great Britain and the Commonwealth) it was found that only 3.3% believed in a personal god, whilst 78.8% strongly disagreed with the idea.
Source(s):
EJ Larson and L Witham: ‘Leading scientists still reject God’, Nature, p394, 1998, 313
R Elisabeth Cornwell and Michael Stirrat, maunuscript in preparation.
June 18th, 2011 at 6:02 pm
Hahaha, this is too funny. I won’t be surprised if he said, “ooh… Big Bang!!!” 😉
July 25th, 2011 at 10:02 am
I know it’s just a cartoon, but the “Scientific Method” was developed by Christians and Muslims
August 8th, 2011 at 7:22 pm
I take your point… but the fact remains that most scientists today are not religious.
In a 1998 survey of members of the National Academy Of Sciences, only 7% believed in a personal god. Richard Dawkins observes that that’s almost the polar opposite of the general american public.
In a more recent survey of the Royal Society (scientists of Great Britain and the Commonwealth) it was found that only 3.3% believed in a personal god, whilst 78.8% strongly disagreed with the idea.
Source(s):
EJ Larson and L Witham: ‘Leading scientists still reject God’, Nature, p394, 1998, 313
R Elisabeth Cornwell and Michael Stirrat, maunuscript in preparation.
March 29th, 2015 at 1:11 pm
He could just call HER name.